<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>历史技术 on Jeanphilo Blog</title><link>https://shio-chan-dev.github.io/jeanblog/zh/tags/%E5%8E%86%E5%8F%B2%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF/</link><description>Recent content in 历史技术 on Jeanphilo Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.159.2</generator><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:35:03 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://shio-chan-dev.github.io/jeanblog/zh/tags/%E5%8E%86%E5%8F%B2%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>为 COBOL 辩护：为什么老语言仍有价值</title><link>https://shio-chan-dev.github.io/jeanblog/zh/dev/general/defend-cobol/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 15:35:03 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://shio-chan-dev.github.io/jeanblog/zh/dev/general/defend-cobol/</guid><description>从稳定性、领域适配与成本角度讨论 COBOL 的价值。</description></item></channel></rss>